If your site is a handful of pages that don't change daily — a homepage, pricing, about, contact — a Next.js template will almost always cost less and load faster than a subscription builder. If you need a drag-and-drop editor, a built-in blog or store, or you're not comfortable editing a text file, a builder like Wix or Squarespace is the better tool. The rest of this post is the actual math and tradeoffs behind that one-line answer.
What each option really is
A website builder is a hosted platform: you log in, drag components onto a page, and the company runs the servers, the editor, and the updates for you, for a recurring fee. A Next.js template is code you own outright — you (or a developer) edit a file, run a build, and host the result, often for free on a static hosting tier. There's no monthly editor subscription because there's no editor to subscribe to.
Neither is a scam or a downgrade from the other. They're built for different jobs.
The 3-year cost, side by side
On annual billing, Wix runs $17/month for its Light plan up to $159/month for Business Elite, and Squarespace runs $16/month for Basic up to $99/month for Advanced. Most small businesses land in the middle tiers — call it $23–$39/month either way.
| Approach | Setup cost | Ongoing cost | 3-year total (rough) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website builder (Wix/Squarespace, mid-tier) | $0 | $23–$39/month | $830–$1,400 |
| Next.js template (one-time) | $19–$79 | ~$0–$5/month (static hosting) | $19–$260 |
That gap is real, and it compounds every year you keep the site running. It's not a reason to always pick the cheaper option — it's a reason to be clear about what the extra cost is actually buying you.
What the extra cost buys you
Builder subscriptions aren't just markup. They include a visual editor a non-technical person can use alone, built-in blog/store/booking modules, hosting and security patches handled for you, and support you can call when something breaks. If any of those matter to your business — a shop owner posting new products weekly, a team with no developer on staff — that's a legitimate reason to pay for it every month.
A template doesn't include any of that. You get a fast, clean site and nothing else. What you save in subscription fees, you spend in the setup work of getting the pages built and content written the one time.
Speed and SEO: the part builders don't advertise well
A static Next.js site typically loads in a fraction of a second because there's no database call, no plugin stack, and no visual builder's runtime JavaScript sitting between the click and the page. Page speed is a confirmed Google ranking signal, and it's also the single biggest factor in whether a visitor on mobile data waits for your page or bounces.
Builder-based sites can be fast too, but you're at the mercy of however much JavaScript and how many third-party widgets the platform loads by default — something you don't control the way you do with your own codebase.
Ownership and lock-in
This is the tradeoff people notice too late. With a website builder, your pages exist only inside that platform's editor. If you ever want to switch providers or host elsewhere, most builders don't offer a way to export your design as usable code — you're rebuilding from scratch, not moving house. Google's own documentation on structuring sites assumes you control your HTML directly, which a builder abstracts away from you by design.
A Next.js template is the opposite: the code is yours from day one. You can move hosts, hand it to a different developer, or fork it into a second site, because it's just files, not a subscription to someone else's editor.
Where a template genuinely falls short
To be fair to builders: if you need a non-technical teammate to publish new pages weekly without ever touching code, a template is the wrong tool — you'll be fighting the workflow instead of the cost. Templates also don't come with a built-in store, booking system, or CMS dashboard; if you need those, you're either integrating them yourself or you should be on a builder or a full platform built for that job.
A quick decision checklist
Pick a website builder if:
- Someone non-technical needs to publish new content regularly, alone.
- You need a store, booking system, or blog with dozens of posts a year.
- You'd rather pay monthly for support than do a one-time setup.
Pick a Next.js template if:
- Your site is a fixed set of pages that changes rarely (homepage, pricing, about, contact).
- You want the lowest possible 3-year cost and don't mind a one-time setup.
- You want to own the code outright and never worry about platform lock-in.
Where our templates fit
We build exactly the second category: static Next.js 15 + Tailwind marketing sites, shipped with English and Simplified Chinese from day one, with all copy in a single file you edit directly. There's SaaS Starter ($19), Realty Starter ($24) for real estate agents, and Landing Starter ($19) for a simple one-page site. If you want to see the code quality before spending anything, there's also a free UI kit you can grab and try first.
Bottom line
Don't compare a $19 template to a $23/month builder on price alone — compare what each one has to actually do for your business. If your pages barely change and you're comfortable with a one-time setup, the template wins on cost and speed. If you need an editor a non-technical person can run alone, pay for the builder and don't feel bad about it.
Sources: